Join Our WhatsApp Group for Scholarships Broadcast Messages and Follow on X (Formerly Twitter) for News

WhatsApp Broadcast Group

Canada Express Entry CRS Cut-Off Scores (2022-2026): The Real Trendline Behind the “Magic Number”

If you’ve been refreshing Express Entry updates and thinking “Why is the CRS cut-off suddenly so low / so high?”, you’re not imagining things. From 2022 to early 2026, the same Express Entry system has produced everything from ultra-competitive Provincial Nominee rounds in the 800s to targeted category rounds dropping into the 300s—and even lower for very specific groups.

Ask Questions on our X Account

Before we dive in: Express Entry is a pathway to Canadian permanent residence (PR). Some people call it a “work visa route” because PR leads to work authorization in Canada, but the invitations are for PR applications.

What you should take away (fast)?

  • There is no single “CRS cut-off”—it changes by round type (PNP vs CEC vs French vs occupation-targeted rounds).
  • 2024–2026 is the era of targeted selection: category-based and program-specific draws reshaped what “competitive” looks like.
  • A “low CRS” headline usually means a narrow category, not that Express Entry suddenly became easy for everyone.

The 2022–2026 CRS score Snapshot (Ranges that Actually Matter)

This table shows how wide the CRS cut-offs swing when you look across all draws in each year.

year draws itas_total min_crs max_crs median_crs
2022 24 46538 491 808 692
2023 42 110266 354 791 486
2024 52 98903 336 816 524.5
2025 58 113998 379 855 533.5
2026 9 30848 169 789 511

What a CRS “cut-off” really means (and why it jumps)?

A draw’s published CRS number is the score of the lowest-ranked candidate invited in that round. It is not a fixed pass mark—and it’s not a prediction for the next draw.

CRS cut-offs jump because IRCC can change:

  • Who is eligible in that round (all-program vs CEC vs French vs a specific occupation category),
  • How many invitations are issued,
  • And how the pool is behaving (how many candidates are sitting above your score).

The Big Shifts that Changed CRS patterns from 2022 to 2026?

1) Category-based selection became the “new normal”

Legislative changes in 2022 opened the door for more targeted selection, and by mid-2023 category-based invitations started reshaping the draw landscape. By 2024, category-based rounds were a major part of the year’s invitation strategy.

2) Job-offer CRS points were removed (and that changed competition)

From March 25, 2025, candidates stopped receiving CRS bonus points for arranged employment/job offers. That single change forced many candidates to compete more heavily on language, education, experience, and nominations instead.

3) 2026 shows how targeted rounds can produce “shockingly low” cut-offs

When a draw targets a very specific, smaller eligible pool, the cut-off can fall dramatically. That doesn’t mean the overall pool is low—it means the target group is narrower.


CRS ranges by draw type (use this to set your target score)

2026 (Year-to-date)

type draws itas crs_range median_crs
CEC 3 20000 508–511 509
French 1 8500 400–400 400
PNP 4 1957 711–789 747.5
Physicians 1 391 169–169 169

2025 (full year)

type draws itas crs_range median_crs
French 9 48000 379–481 416
CEC 15 35850 515–547 531
Healthcare 7 14500 462–510 475
PNP 24 10898 667–855 748
Education 2 3500 462–479 470.5
Trades 1 1250 505–505 505

2024 (full year)

type draws itas crs_range median_crs
CEC 10 26500 507–547 518.5
French 11 23000 336–478 410
PNP 14 15483 663–816 716
General 9 14445 524–549 535
Healthcare 3 10250 422–463 445
STEM 1 4500 491–491 491
Trades 2 3600 433–436 434.5
Transport 1 975 430–430 430
Agriculture 1 150 437–437 437

2023 (full year)

type draws itas crs_range median_crs
All-program 19 76700 481–561 496
French 6 8700 375–486 454.5
STEM 2 6400 481–486 483.5
Healthcare 3 5600 431–476 463
PNP 5 4396 691–791 748
Trades 2 2500 388–425 406.5
Transport 2 1670 435–435 435
Agriculture 2 1000 354–386 370
FSW program 1 3300 489–489 489

2022 (full year)

type draws itas crs_range median_crs
All-program 11 35750 491–557 510
PNP 13 10788 674–808 754

The extremes: Lowest vs Highest CRS cut-offs (2022–2026)

Lowest cut-offs in this period

date year draw type crs itas
2026-02-19 2026 397 Physicians 169 391
2024-02-29 2024 287 French 336 2500
2024-03-26 2024 291 French 338 1500
2023-09-28 2023 267 Agriculture 354 600
2024-02-01 2024 282 French 365 7000
2023-07-12 2023 258 French 375 3800
2025-03-21 2025 341 French 379 7500
2023-12-21 2023 278 Agriculture 386 400
2023-08-03 2023 261 Trades 388 1500
2024-08-15 2024 310 French 394 2000

Highest cut-offs in this period

date year draw type crs itas
2025-09-29 2025 369 PNP 855 291
2024-11-18 2024 325 PNP 816 174
2024-11-12 2024 322 PNP 812 733
2022-01-05 2022 213 PNP 808 392
2025-02-04 2025 334 PNP 802 455
2025-08-18 2025 361 PNP 800 192
2022-06-08 2022 224 PNP 796 932
2025-01-07 2025 331 PNP 793 471
2024-10-21 2024 319 PNP 791 648
2023-02-15 2023 241 PNP 791 699

What CRS score should you aim for in 2026?

Instead of chasing one “perfect” score, pick the draw types you realistically qualify for:

  • If you’re targeting PNP: you’re competing in a very different league—PNP cut-offs are typically high because nominations add major points.
  • If you’re eligible for CEC: watch CEC ranges (in 2025 they stayed largely in the 500s; early 2026 is similar).
  • If you have strong French: French-focused rounds have repeatedly produced lower cut-offs than general/CEC/PNP in recent years.
  • If your work experience matches a targeted category: occupation-based rounds can be “surprisingly reachable” if you’re actually in that category.

How to raise your CRS (the moves that still work after 2025 changes)?

Since job-offer points are no longer part of CRS, the strongest levers now are:

  1. Language score upgrades (often the fastest high-impact improvement).
  2. A second language (French can open additional pathways beyond pure CRS competition).
  3. Education strategy (credential upgrades + correct ECA alignment).
  4. Canadian experience (when feasible, it can shift you into more favorable draw types).
  5. Provincial nomination (high effort, high reward—especially if your occupation is in demand regionally).

Philip Morgan

Dr. Philip Morgan is a postdoctoral research fellow and senior editor at daadscholarship.com. He completed both his Master’s and Ph.D. at Stanford University and later continued advanced research in the United States as a Hubert H. Humphrey Fellow. Drawing on his rich academic and international experience, Dr. Morgan writes insightful articles on scholarships, internships, and fellowships for global students. His work aims to guide and inspire aspiring scholars to unlock international education opportunities and achieve their academic dreams. With years of dedication to youth development across Asia, Africa, and beyond, Philips Morgan has helped thousands of students secure admissions, scholarships, and fellowships through accurate, experience-based guidance. All opportunities he shares are thoroughly researched and verified before publication.
Back to top button